The Man of Steel #4 – On this date 40 years ago

The Man of Steel #4
Released July 31, 1986

John Byrne – Writer & Penciller
Dick Giordano – Inker
Tom Ziuko – Colorist
John Costanza – Letterer
Andy Helfer – Editor

As the cover indicates, this issue centers on the introduction of the new, Post-Crisis Lex Luthor. But Byrne opts for a little build-up before the big reveal and the result is some great Lois and Clark interactions that help in setting the foundation for their relationship going forward. I’m not always going to be a fan of how Byrne writes Lois, but most of what happens in the opening pages is strong work.

Lois arrives at Clark’s apartment in full 80s Glamazon style to find Clark still preparing for their evening out. She notes the surprisingly spartan nature of his place while also dropping a crumb of exposition that Clark has been working (very hard, it seems) at the Daily Planet for a year and a half now. (If you’re keeping count, this would make him 26 or 27 depending on where his birthday falls.)

This leads to Lois reiterating her grudge with Clark over the fact that she beat him to the Superman exclusive. This is such a bone of contention with her she can cite how long ago it was specifically. (“Seventeen months, two weeks, four days and an odd number of hours and don’t you forget it, Kent.”)

Clark insists that he didn’t scoop her out of spite, citing that he didn’t even know her then, which… is dancing awfully close to a lie on both counts. He’d met her as Superman AND he gave her an interview knowing full well it would be worthless to her. In any event, it galls Lois to have been beaten by a total newbie.

Petty Lois is one of my least favorite sides of her, especially when it makes her look childish. I love a good scene where she might be petty about getting even with Luthor or any kind of corrupt official she’s exposing. If she was quietly seething about this and doing her best not to show it, I might roll with Lois’s grudge a little more. But here we are seventeen months, two weeks and four days later and she’s still holding onto this ill will and making sure Clark knows it?

Lois – Let. It. Go.

We also get a brief scene seeing Superman shaving by reflecting his heat vision back onto his face. This is followed by another cute moment of Lois remarking how light his weights are. Clark thinks to himself that he’s tried to develop an adequate cover for how Clark Kent could have a build almost as good as Superman’s and eventually tries to pass them off as old weights.

This is when Lois leads them to the roof for their ride to the party – an idling helicopter courtesy of Lex Luthor. Clark remarks that parking the chopper on that roof had to be illegal, to which Lois agrees while reminding him that “anything with the name ‘Luthor’ on it is pretty much above the law.” I like how concisely this sets the stage for Luthor’s entrance. She goes on to call him the second or third richest men in the world and definitely one of the most powerful.

Byrne has credited ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN writer Marv Wolfman with coming up with this corporate raider version of Lex. Wolfman pitched Lex as a Charles Foster Kane type, ensconced in his estate with his mistress, Lois Lane. Byrne wasn’t a fan of the Lois angle, but he immediately saw the value in making Lex more Donald Trump-like.

“No one’s been able to connect his name with anything even remotely shady. And believe me, no one’s dug deeper than I have,” Lois says and for all my criticisms of Byrne’s interpretation of Lois, I’m glad he gets this one thing very right. Lois Lane should never fall for Lex Luthor’s bullshit — not even for a minute. She’d never believe a guy like that wouldn’t have some kind of shady shit in his closet, and if her reporter instincts are worth a damn, she should be investigating him from the moment they meet.

My strong dedication to the belief that “Superman doesn’t kill,” has an equally strong parallel one that is “Lois Lane would never fall for Lex Luthor.”

Clark is apparently not as sure of this fact as I am when they reach Luthor’s yacht, as he brings up the apparently common knowledge that Luthor has designs on Lois. She says Lex is fascinated with her because she has no interest in becoming part of his collection and she’s told him so.

Their host finally shows himself and after attempting to charm Lois, expresses shock that Clark declined an award of excellence for his Superman Exclusive. Clark says it didn’t seem fair considering that landing him the job at the Planet was reward enough. (And presumably, his journalistic ethics hounded him after the fact for his moral transgression in writing that article.)

Lois is none too pleased when she realizes that Luthor sent her dress for the evening not as a loaner, but as a full-on gift. To make the point of how little interest she has in being charmed by Lex, she demands Clark’s coat and then strips the dress off right then and there to return it to Luthor.

While this is Serena van der Woodsen levels of dramatic, a persistent egotist like Luthor has definitely earned the blunt and public rejection. And on her way out, Lois can’t resist a cheap shot that Luthor should spend his money on a better barber because he’s starting to look like Fred Mertz.

(For the record – THAT is the kind of Petty Lois I’m into.)

And then in short order the yacht is taken over by terrorists, with Clark getting “knocked overboard,” providing him with an opportunity to change into Superman and deliver the yacht to Luthor’s private island. Lois is no slouch either, seizing on the distraction to attack one of the goons and take his gun. This keeps them at bay long enough for Superman to step in and wrap things up.

Impressed with the display, Luthor offers Superman a check as a means of keeping him on retainer. Superman declines – politely – saying his services aren’t for sale. Lex isn’t having that and mentions that when his security team assessed there was a credible hijacking threat from these terrorists, he ordered his security to hold back so that he could see what Superman was capable of.

Superman finds it revolting that Luthor would so callously put people at risk just to study him. The Mayor – who was on board this entire incident – is even less amused and deputizes Superman to arrest Luthor for reckless endangerment. Lex practically laughs in his face, saying “You can’t arrest me. I’m Lex Luthor. I’m the most powerful man in Metropolis.”

To which the Mayor retorts, “Not anymore.” (I kinda wish that line had gone to Superman.)

This is followed by a great “silent” sequence of Lex Luthor being treated like a common criminal. His mugshot is taken. He’s fingerprinted and then thrown in a holding cell.

As super-villain motivations go, I think the humbling of an arrogant bastard who thought himself untouchable is much more compelling than “I hate you because you cost me my hair!”

The final conversation between Luthor and Superman makes it clear that Luthor’s bruised ego can hold a grudge even more aggressively than Lois does. He’s going to make it his mission to remind Metropolis that HE, not Superman is top dog. He boasts that he’ll kill Superman and he’ll never go to jail for it.

And thus begins the dynamic that will define this relationship for the next several years – Lex bedevils Superman, while keeping his hands just clean enough to avoid any legal entanglements. No matter what he does, Superman and Lois just can’t nail him.

I’ve heard criticisms that Lex being able to stay this far above the law made Superman look ineffective. Personally, I think that makes an even better point about how hard it is to punish corruption when the perpetrator is one of the richest and most powerful men in the world. It’s an indictment not of Superman, but of the integrity of the system that Superman upholds.

This wouldn’t have been a shocking idea even at the time it was printed (it was the EIGHTIES for crying outloud. We were dealing with one of the most corrupt Presidential administrations up to that time.), but it’s even more relevant now. We couldn’t ask for a better demonstration of how unprepared our system is to deal with naked, blatant abuse of power from the ruling class than the second Trump administration.

In our world, every day has at least one Watergate-level scandal, and yet That Guy still wields power. And if Superman was real, there isn’t much more he could do acting within the bounds of the law. Reinventing Lex in this manner was a great way to give Luthor a lot of built-in advantages that aren’t easily negated, even when the full truth comes out.


Discover more from Super Fan XL – 40 Years Of Post-Crisis Superman

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

14 responses to “The Man of Steel #4 – On this date 40 years ago”

  1. Ben Herman: In My Not So Humble Opinion Avatar

    I’m not a huge fan of how Byrne wrote Lois, but it did lay the vital groundwork for the really great characterization of her by Jurgens, Ordway and others just a few short years later.

    Yeah, agreed with you that this version of Luthor is actually ahead of its time. I’m sure that if the corporate raider incarnation of Lex was a real person, even when confronted with iron-clad proof of his crimes & corruption there would be at least a third of the population who would react with total indifference because, hey, being a billionaire is awesome and if they were in Luthor’s shoes they’d be doing exactly the same thing to get even richer, no matter how immoral & illegal it was, and besides, he’s making Metropolis great again.

    1. bitterscriptreader Avatar

      I used to think that about the groundwork, but reading this part of the run alongside the portions of the Triangle Era when the later teams actually get them together changed my opinion a bit. They don’t really build on anything Byrne sets up so much as they discard it. At best, Byrne just put them in a holding pattern and Ordway, Stern and Jurgens finally got to the point of “Moving on…”

      Though I’ll give Byrne credit for how he basically takes Lana completely off the board as a romantic rival. The first two years of this run could not be clearer about how Clark sees Lana firmly in the Friend Zone and that probably saved the later teams from having to do too much work in clearing the way for Clark/Lois.

      Lex being a hero to Metropolis is great for the reasons you mention and also for how it makes his downfall even more foolish on his part. Metropolis LOVES him and that’s not enough for him because they love Superman MORE. He’ll throw away everything he’s achieved just to get rid of him and to avenge the slight of spending two hours behind bars.

      1. Ben Herman: In My Not So Humble Opinion Avatar

        That’s so typical of narcissistic sociopaths, though. Everything has to be about them, and only them. “How dare you love Superman more than you love me, you ungrateful peasants!?!” And of course, the post-Crisis version of Luthor was even more like Trump than we realized at the time. Superman lives rent-free in Lex’s head, just like Obama does in Trump’s.

      2. Dave Thomer Avatar
        Dave Thomer

        I wonder if that Who’s Who entry on Lois will be the furthest that Lois’s interest in Clark gets before 1989!

        Now that I’m reading DC’s output from 1984 (just finished February) I am starting to see what you mean about Lana’s presence pre-CRISIS. In the issues I just read, Lana’s the close colleague at WGBS and I think Lois has a one-panel cameo in an issue of WORLD’S FINEST!

        If I can contrast Lex with DC’s other pre-eminent city-dominating billionaire, I think that Lex’s downfall is that he needs to be in control as much as he wants to be feared and admired, and Bruce Wayne doesn’t have either of those needs, even if his family name is all over Gotham. So Bruce can be a hero in his city in a way that Lex never can in his.

  2. davethomer Avatar
    davethomer

    Another thing that the CEO version of Lex brings to the table is that he is always lurking in the background, maneuvering for advantage. It’s a dynamic that a traditional supervillain doesn’t pull off as well, since they usually stay off the board in between their specific schemes. Now that I think of it, that’s probably one reason why so many books want to set the heroes against a corruption in the government these days.

    In terms of Lois’ pettiness at Clark – I think I’ve come to the conclusion that she’s right to be bitter/petty, but not for the reasons she thinks she is. Which is another point in favor of the “Clark shouldn’t have written that story about himself.” It was interesting to see Lois push back against it in SUPERMAN (2025), too.

    As I was typing this, I didn’t change my mind about any of the preceding paragraph, but it did occur to me that either way – a story about Superman that’s based entirely on an interview with Superman isn’t really that great of a journalistic achievement anyway, because it doesn’t depend on any investigating or research on the part of the reporter. Imagine a story where Lois had interviewed enough witnesses and collected enough information from all of those scenes she visited in issue 2 that she had independently verified information about Superman, such that Clark felt like he NEEDED to give her an interview in order to have some say on how that info would be interpreted. THAT would have established Lois as a great reporter in a way that this miniseries and SUPERMAN (1978) don’t really do.

    It’s also interesting to see exactly where Lois draws the line in terms of Lex – the party, the chopper, the loaned dress, etc. are all things she accepts, grudgingly or not. But the dress as a gift is not appropriate. I think you can maybe see this as evidence of how Lois sees herself – she’s enough of a celebrity that being loaned an expensive dress is a big deal but not totally out of the ordinary. Or maybe I’ve just seen too much coverage of press tours lately.

    Last thought for now: when Superman is carrying the ship, we get another thought bubble where Byrne tries to make Superman’s powers weirder in order to have them “make sense.” The lettering even looks a little different in that one bubble – I went and pulled my copy of the issue out of the long box in order to see if that was in the original, and it was. I wonder if that was a last minute dialogue tweak. (Side benefit, I can compare the newsprint colors to the digital version. That’s always fascinating.)

    1. bitterscriptreader Avatar

      I like your take on Lois as reporter, but having her “right for the wrong reasons” often is problematic to me because if the way she gets there is tainted, it’s tainting her as a person.

      There’s an episode of LOIS & CLARK where everyone (except Clark) is affected by a perfume that removes their inhibitions and makes them super horny for the person they’re attracted to. Naturally this means Lois spends most of the episode – two days of real time, we’re told – trying all manner of ways to seducing Clark, culminating in showing up at his place and doing the Dance of the Seven Veils. Despite the fact that Lois is the romantic aggressor and that she’s enthusiastically – nay, aggressively – giving him consent, Clark keeps rebuffing her advances because he knows its wrong.

      Then at the episode’s climax, Lois encounters Superman in a situation where she thinks he’s under the same love spell (and he doesn’t disabuse her of it) and she spends about three seconds contemplating the wrongness of it before she dives in and makes out with him.

      WE know that Superman is not under the influence, and that he’s intentionally put himself in this situation. WE know that he could have rebuffed her advances if he wanted to… but Lois DOESN’T. We see upset over how she humiliated herself when she wasn’t in control, and how upset she is to have been acting so silly… and when presented with someone she believes is equally helpless to control themselves, she goes for it.

      It’s one of those moments that doesn’t speak well of her.

      And so here, she’d be SO justified to hold a grudge if her reasons were journalistic ethics. But they’re not. It’s all about her ego. It’s not just that she lost, it’s that she lost to a guy off the street. (In many ways, her issues with Clark parallel Lex’s ego-driven hatred of Superman.)

      And part of this problem is that Lois’s beef comes up CONSTANTLY from here on out. Too much of her character under Byrne is defined by it.

      1. Dave Thomer Avatar
        Dave Thomer

        Totally agree with you that being right for the wrong reasons is bad for Lois as a character. And it would just take a slight nudge in a different direction to make this work. Like, if her instincts are telling her that it’s just too convenient that this guy shows up out of nowhere and gets the interview that every seasoned reporter has been chasing, and then she has the “this doesn’t seem right either” moment with the weights, so now she’s suspicious of Clark and feels like there’s a story there . . . you could absolutely use this to show why she’s one of the best at what she does, but Byrne doesn’t do that.

        (And I’m a diehard Lois-and-Clark fan at this point in my life, so it’s not like I want Lois to be suspicious of Clark, but c’mon, this is exactly the point at their relationship where that makes the most sense, and then if she starts to fall for Clark at the same time that she’s suspicious, you can get a ton of mileage out of that.)

        On the powers – I think I notice it because I read the DC Heroes RPG rulebook before I read any Byrne-written Superman, and the way they try to translate the Byrne explanations into the game mechanics was perplexing in an amusing way or amusing in a perplexing way, I’m still trying to figure out which.

        At this point 40-year-old newsprint looks a little dull to me, but that’s also part of its charm. That’s what comics looked like to me when I started reading them regularly. (It took me a little bit to get used to the Baxter format books when I started reading some of them.) I know you also have the omnibuses and maybe some of the trades – how close do the digital versions look to the paper reprints?

    2. bitterscriptreader Avatar

      Forgot to add this: Yeah, the thing about his powers is a little odd. I didn’t call it out here, but it comes up in a later review where Byrne explains a little more clearly what he’s trying to achieve.

      For me, I kinda like it. It’s an effort at tying some of his powers to some kind of scientific foundation and as a bonus, much of it makes Superboy’s powers possible much later in the run.

      And I also enjoy comparing the digital to the original printing when I can. There are some issues that don’t look great with the more vivid colors and some that really are enhanced by it.

  3. bitterscriptreader Avatar

    @Dave – “I wonder if that Who’s Who entry on Lois will be the furthest that Lois’s interest in Clark gets before 1989!”

    Having read somewhat ahead… pretty much.

    I like your take on Lois’s reporter instincts pinging on Clark. I think JMS did something sorta like that in one of the EARTH ONE installments.

    As far as Digital vs the Omnis… the Omnis look like they did in my mind when I read them, which is not to say they’re EXACTLY what they were… just looking like what they always SHOULD have been, if that makes sense.

    The thing about the digital issues of Byrne’s run is that the line art isn’t as sharp as it was in print. I don’t think they had the original art for many of those and so when they made those collections, they were kind of making a copy of a copy. It’s the same sort of muddle you can see in the original ABSOLUTE CRISIS collection.

    That’s not present in the Omnis. I guess they either had better elements to work with or spent much more time on restoration, but they look great. Maybe I should pull out a side-by-side comparison between the original issues, the digital, and the Omni printing one of these days.

    1. Dave Thomer Avatar
      Dave Thomer

      Interesting. I assumed that the digital issues were using whatever files they produced for the MAN OF STEEL trades a few years back – maybe they went back and generated new files for the Omnis?

      Never read the EARTH ONE books . . . maybe I ought to one of these days.

      1. bitterscriptreader Avatar

        Well, the Byrne trades were something like 20 years ago and the hardcovers were… almost ten years ago? The recent Omnis have all been in the last three years so I think that’s the difference.

        But honestly if you compare the digital versions I post here with the original issues, you’ll probably see some of the muddled line work stuff I’m talking about.

  4. Dave Thomer Avatar
    Dave Thomer

    I’m usually reading what’s in DC Universe Infinite – this was the first time I went hunting for the printed issue and I have the dust inhalation to prove it! I think I see what you mean about the linework when I compare page 19 in the issue to what you have posted here.

  5. Ben Herman: In My Not So Humble Opinion Avatar

    I forgot to say, I do like the post-Crisis setup of the Superman / Luthor adversarial relationship that Byrne establishes here. It obviously foregoes the Silver Age rational of Lex saying, “I’m going to become a criminal and try to kill Superman because I blame him for ruining my experiment and causing my hair to fall out” and I honestly think that’s a really good thing.

    The way Byrne sets it up, Superman and Luthor are two of the most powerful men in the world. They are opposite sides of the same coin. For Luthor, his power is just a means to an end, to gain even *more* power, more wealth, more influence, and he does not care else he has to destroy; in fact, he actively enjoys it when he wrecks other people’s lives. For Clark Kent / Superman, though, his power is something that he wants to use to *help* people, to make the world a better place, because unlike Luthor he genuinely cares about the welfare of others. And I love that throughout the post-Crisis era it’s shown that in his Clark Kent identity he’s also helping people and fighting for truth & justice as an investigative reporter.

    So, yeah, a good dynamic that’s first established here that would fuel a lot of great stories over the next couple of decades.

  6. […] have our first reader question (sorta)! Last week in the post on THE MAN OF STEEL #4, regular commentor Dave Thomer and I ended up in a conversation about how some of the digital […]

Leave a Reply

I’m Adam Mallinger

I’m a lifelong Superman fan who got to live his dream in 2020 when I was hired on the CW show SUPERMAN & LOIS as Writers’ Assistant. In my second season there, I was promoted to Staff Writer and I remained on staff through seasons 2 and 3. During my time there I wrote one episode in each of the four seasons and co-wrote the SUPERMAN & LOIS comic.

I also used to blog and tweet under the name The Bitter Script Reader. I also wrote the book MICHAEL F-ING BAY: THE UNHERALDED GENIUS IN MICHAEL BAY’S FILMS under that name.

I started this blog as a tribute to my favorite era of Superman, the Post-Crisis incarnation also often referred to as “The Triangle Era.” Each issue of Post-Crisis Superman will be covered on the 40th anniversary of its original release.

Email me at ZuulTheReader@gmail.com

Let’s connect

Mega-Post of links to S&L Blu-rays, DVDs, Comics, interviews, Behind-the-Scenes Posts and Commissions!
Want to buy Post-Crisis Superman collections? Read this post!

Discover more from Super Fan XL - 40 Years Of Post-Crisis Superman

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Super Fan XL - 40 Years Of Post-Crisis Superman

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading