The Man of Steel #3 – On this date 40 years ago

The Man of Steel #3
Released July 17, 1986

John Byrne – Writer & Penciller
Dick Giordano – Inker
Tom Ziuko – Colorist
John Costanza – Letterer
Andy Helfer – Editor

I didn’t realized until I was doing research for this post that this issue is technically the debut of the Post-Crisis Batman.

I mentioned in an earlier post that there was this unusual interregnum period in DC publishing that was released after CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS, but wasn’t Post-Crisis in a continuity sense. It’s a complete departure from how DC has handled all their reboots since then. ONE YEAR LATER actually kicked off before the finale of INFINITE CRISIS. THE NEW 52 restarted all of their books in the same month after FLASHPOINT concluded. REBIRTH was also a line-wide relaunch in the same month.

So it was surprising to look at the dates and realize that once CRISIS concluded, the new launches were staggered. True, Batman had THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS publishing from February 1986 to August 1986, but that was out of continuity while the mainline books continued on. The first issue that’s truly recognized as Post-Crisis continuity for Batman was Issue 401, and that came out three weeks after this issue. (Even then, BATMAN: YEAR ONE didn’t start until issue 404, released in November!)

If any of this put restrictions on how Byrne could depict Batman, you never feel the issue straining at it. If you take a closer look at the story, you notice that none of Batman’s supporting cast appears – not even Commissioner Gordon – and that the story uses an original villain with a clean slate rather than a familiar antagonist.

Of course the reason you don’t think about this is because this is a story about Superman and Batman’s clashing ideologies and so the villain isn’t the true antagonist of the story. They’re just a means to an end. It would be too big of a plot if they were hunting The Joker or Two-Face. A villain like that upstages the heroes and their mad scheme would have to take center stage. But by using a D-List level villain, the story has more room to breathe.

I first read this issue as a kid with almost as much knowledge of Batman as I had of Superman. I endlessly watched the Adam West BATMAN series in reruns, often with my OFFICIAL BATMAN BATBOOK in hand. I’d seen Batman and Superman work together in SUPER FRIENDS. BATMAN FROM THE 30s TO THE 70s gave me a sense of the various eras of the character and how he evolved.

I also was familiar with one of the earliest stories of Superman and Batman teaming up in SUPERMAN #76, where they immediately regarded each other as the best of friends after their secret identities were accidentally exposed to each other.

If you read that story now, the set-up is contrived in a way that will have you thinking you’re reading slash fanfic. Bruce Wayne and Clark Kent have both booked cabins on a cruise ship, but due to overcrowding, they have to share a room together. In the real world, this would never happen. That cruise company would give millionaire Bruce Wayne the one free room and tell the nerdy reporter that shit happens. An emergency arises before the boat even leaves the dock, provoking both men to change into their other identities in the dark while hoping the other one doesn’t notice. Of course, light shining into the porthole blows that plan and they spring into action, shocking before we ever get an awkward scene of the men debating how they’re going to resolve the math problem of two bodies and only one bed.

But this is Post-Crisis now, and the gritty realism of the day demands a more grounded approach to teaming them up than merely serendipitous travel plans. But before I get into that, I just have to say, GODDAMN does Byrne draw an amazing Batman.

Batman is shaking down Bull, a henchman working for Magpie. Either Bull is having the luckiest night ever or Batman is still early enough in his career to have a slip like this, but Bull gets away from him before he has to give up any info. Batman swings off into the night only to find his Bat line is being held by Superman! The Man of Steel is intent on taking this “outlaw” to police headquarters. Obviously it’s not going to be that easy.

Superman goes to grab him again and Batman warns he’s surrounded by an intangible field. See, ever since Superman first showed up eight months ago (Time Jump Alert!), he expected they might cross paths, so he came up with a precaution. If Superman penetrates the field around Batman in any way, it will trigger a signal and set off a bomb hidden somewhere in the city, killing an innocent person.

Pre-Crisis had Superman and Batman bunking together in their first adventure. In this one they can’t even touch each other. That shows you the difference in comics post-SEDUCTION OF THE INNOCENT by Fredric Wertham.

Anyway, we find Magpie furious that Bull didn’t take the opportunity to mislead Batman with bad intel. And in an action that seems just a little extreme – she blows him up,

It’s her bad luck she didn’t know Superman was in town because the sound of that explosion leads him and Batman right to her at the Old Gotham Museum of Antiquities, closed for years now.

Though they round up her thugs, Magpie gets away using toxic gas as a distraction. Fortunately, Batman uses his Batmobile’s portable crime lab to examine the shards of Magpie’s gas vial, and finds a fibre that’s 5,000 years old. He tells Superman, “There’s only one place in Gotham City where she’d come into contact with five thousand year-old cloth of precisely THAT variety! Follow me!”

Personally I think Superman lets Batman have this win. Magpie isn’t exactly what you’d call inconspicuous and someone with his abilities could have found her pretty easily. Either way, this clue leads them to another, unnamed museum, where they intercept Magpie and boast that they checked the employment records of this museum and found the name “Margaret Pye.”

Then, just to dunk on her, Superman grabs her wig.

Yes, all of this is a little too easy and pat, but like I said, the villain plot isn’t the real story here. It’s about the interactions between Superman and Batman. Byrne’s not trying to write the ultimate Batman and Superman team-up – he’s just after a story that let’s him establish their contrasting views and evolved them a little. And by that standard, this issue is a success.

Superman points out there’s still the matter of Batman’s hidden bomb, and he’s stunned when Batman reveals where it’s hidden.

Batman not only foresaw Superman coming for him, he also was ready in case Superman called his bluff, and so the only way to make it work was to plant the bomb on himself. That is one cold SOB.

But it allows them to part on friendly terms, if not as friends. Batman’s final thought is interesting to me, as he muses “In a different reality, I might have called him ‘Friend.’” For years I just assumed that to be a wink at Pre-Crisis continuity, but it’s also a line from the STAR TREK episode “Balance of Terror,” spoken by a Romulan Commander who has gained respect for Captain Kirk.

Over the years I’ve realized Byrne used to use some sneaky references like this and I’m looking forward to spotting some I might have missed before.

When MAN OF STEEL is stacked up against other Superman relaunches, a common knock against it is that unlike some of its competition, it’s less of a singular narrative and more of a collection of short stories. I’ll dispute this to some extent. Issues 1 and 2 flow continuously from one to the other. Issue 4 also would flow pretty smoothly from 2 in a narrative sense, despite the time jump. Issue 5 has standalone qualities, but follows pretty effectively on 4, and then Issue 6 is a solid bookend to the first issue.

This issue is the only truly standalone tale within the miniseries. It’s not connected to any of the other issues and none of the other issues connect to it. But given the ground that THE MAN OF STEEL is trying to cover, I’d rather it tell its story this way rather than force Batman into a larger story where he doesn’t belong, just so we can get an understanding of how he relates to Superman in this continuity.

And for my money, this tension between Superman and Batman is much more interesting than the SUPER FRIENDS days where they had basically the same personality and got along. There’s a long game being played here with this relationship, and I like how every subsequent team-up with Batman builds their mutual trust and respect just a little bit more until finally they get to the point of being real friends.

The advantage of resetting the continuity is that you can write so many of these relationships as slow burns. I’m sure there were fans frustrated by it at the time, just as I’m sure fans were impatient to get Clark and Lois together. But because comic books have so much story space to fill, you don’t want to rush your characters to the end point. It’s a marathon, not a sprint. One of the joys of the Byrne Era and Post-Byrne Era is that incremental character growth and development over long stretches of time.


Discover more from Super Fan XL – 40 Years Of Post-Crisis Superman

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 responses to “The Man of Steel #3 – On this date 40 years ago”

  1. Ben Herman: In My Not So Humble Opinion Avatar

    The one-two punch of Man of Steel #3 and The Dark Knight Returns #4 definitely resulted in a very different relationship between Superman and Batman, to be sure.

    To be perfectly honest, I actually prefer MOS #3 to TDKR #4. As you articulate here, MOS #3 is the first meeting between the two characters, they no nothing about each other, it makes sense that neither one of them trusts the other, yet at the end they’ve developed a grudging respect for each other, and there’s room for their relationship to grow & develop over time, for them to gradually become close allies and eventually friends. So, yeah, solid work by John Byrne here.

    In contrast, you have TDKR #4, which if that series had been released just a few years later DC would probably have slapped an “Elseworlds” logo on the cover. Yet because Frank Miller’s story was so wildly popular, too many readers decided to regard TDKR as the definitive version of Batman and Superman, resulting in such nonsense as fanboys regarding Superman as this naive, easily-manipulated government stooge, Batman as this ultra-cool badass who with enough prep time could defeat any foe, and of course the two of them are enemies. I really grew to hate what TDKR did to DC comics in the subsequent decades.

    1. bitterscriptreader Avatar

      Is this where I confess I’m not the biggest fan of THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS? I guess so because there’s really no other place for that on this blog.

      I was just young enough to not have experienced THKR the way it probably should have been for maximum impact. I think I read it a year or two after this, probably was age 8. The college kid at my local library saw me checking out the Superman and Batman collections as often as I could and loaned me his personal trade, figuring “Hey, you might like this.”

      It’s not that I hated it. I just didn’t like it, and in a lot of places, just didn’t get it. I didn’t have any context for a lot of the political and social commentary and I don’t think I could have really explained the plot after reading it. And it has turned out to be a case where my 8 year-old reading has made a deep impression that just can’t be overwritten. Every few years I pull my THE COMPLETE FRANK MILLER BATMAN collection (which is now IN-complete) off the shelf and give it another try, and usually by the second chapter, my brain has glazed over and I’m just looking at the images.

      Then of course there is the issue that bedevils all influential texts – so much of what came after took their cue from some of the characterizations there, so as I got old enough to start understanding it more deeply, I had also taken in MUCH more Batman material that felt of a piece with Miller’s take.

      I wasn’t politically aware enough to understand just how huge of a diss it was to have Superman acting as Ronald Reagan’s lackey, but I definitely wasn’t in to how Batman beat him up. But then, even at the time I read it I understood it was a story that didn’t “count,” and I just moved on to the next one.

  2. davethomer Avatar
    davethomer

    Byrne’s definitely at the top of his game here, and Giordano’s inks are probably helping a lot.

    There are two things you point out in this post that really get at the fact that 1985-1986 was really the first time either DC or Marvel had done anything like this kind of reset/reboot. No one knew how to do it at the time, and what happened here set the stage for how every subsequent effort would be made.

    Point one, I don’t see how there’s any doubt: no one at DC had a definitive idea of how CRISIS was going to end or what was going to come afterward. I don’t have the new Absolute CRISIS set yet, but I wonder if the behind the scenes book of either set nails down when they decided that some characters were going to restart and others weren’t.

    Point two, the idea of the five or six issue arc was still a rarity in the mid-80s, and I think it was far more typical to have a main plot that wrapped up in an issue or two with subplots being the connective tissue. So I think that even though this MAN OF STEEL is a miniseries, it’s operating a lot more like we would expect an ongoing Superman title to act at the time.

    As for Batman – I gotta say, I’ve been waiting 40 years for the de-Millerization of Batman. I don’t want him to be interchangeable with Superman, but it would be nice if he were likable. (I think Byrne does a decent job with that here, so this is more of a DKR/YEAR ONE complaint than anything.)

    I guess I do wonder, though . . . what exactly is Superman’s problem with Batman here? In issue 2 and in this issue, he’s willing to use his powers forcefully against criminals, in this issue he destroys private property without any kind of warrant. The dialogue even has a “yeah, I guess I’m a vigilante too” lamppost. Does it really come down to attitude? Or does Superman project his discomfort with him being above the law onto Batman?

    1. bitterscriptreader Avatar

      Absolute Crisis DOES make mention of this, actually. Marv Wolfman’s preference was that the entire line start over at number 1 with the January releases, right after CRISIS 12. Giordano said they didn’t have enough lead time to get their ducks in a row for that. It says he spent 1985 working out the plans for the Big 3.

      Funny you mention Giordano’s inking because one of Byrne’s big complaints over the years is that Giordano had his assistants doing much of the work. I did some digging and found this quote, which I assume is originally from his message board.

      “When I agreed to do Superman, Dick Giordano, as head honcho of DC, asked me who I would want as my inker. Immediately I said “You!” And with a big smile, Dick agreed. Toward the end of the conversation, tho, knowing Dick’s history, I added, “When I say ‘you’, I mean YOU. Will you promise me that you’ll do it all yourself?” “Of course,” Dick beamed. “This is an important project! I’m excited about working on it!” Then the inks started to come along and I realized Dick’s promise had been made of smoke and sunbeams. He was obviously farming it out — “Dick Art” as this was known around the Office — and the “important” project was getting no better from him than on anything else he’d inked in a lot of years. It was the one of many disappointments that grew around the Superman assignment.” – John Byrne, 12/19/2012 https://www.facebook.com/groups/10534150636/posts/10157902573860637/

      I hear you on Batman needing to escape the shadow of Miller’s stories. I feel like the ongoing books have done a good job swinging closer to the more human, but still serious takes we saw in the 70s. When it comes to the movies, though… I really liked the Nolan trilogy, but I wish after that, the next filmic take had been less grim and gritty. I don’t need full Adam West, but I’d like a dash of the fantastical to return.

      As for Superman’s antagonism to Batman, I’m going to assume that as this was being developed in parallel with YEAR ONE, the Bat-Office decided that Batman shouldn’t be too chummy with the police this early. Or at the very least, that the public wouldn’t know that Batman is operating with the same kind of unofficial police sanction that Superman has. Byrne keeps Gordon off-screen in this so we don’t have to deal with exactly what his relationship with Batman is.

      1. davethomer Avatar
        davethomer

        I know the point of your blog isn’t to dissect CRISIS but it’s one of those things where you see the shockwaves from decisions made in 1984 and 1985 still reverberating years later, and it fascinates me.

        I guess I’m not surprised that Giordano possibly couldn’t take a ton of time off from his day job to do inking (GET SOME SLEEP JIM LEE!), but I will say I like what I see in MAN OF STEEL better than the 90s stuff where Byrne inked himself, so whaddaya gonna do?

        My ideal Batman range is from BATMAN: THE ANIMATED SERIES to BATMAN: THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD. The comics get close sometimes but I think a lot of them still learn too hard on the “he’s damaged and he can’t trust and that makes him damage his relationships on a roughly annual basis” angle.

        As for this issue in particular: yeah, Superman seems to assume that the Gotham police want to arrest Batman, but we don’t know that’s true, and it doesn’t seem like Superman ever visits them to see how they feel about a superstrong flying guy with laser eyes doing business in Gotham. Of course, we also don’t know what stories have made their way from Gotham to Metropolis over this time, either.

      2. Ben Herman: In My Not So Humble Opinion Avatar

        Yes, that’s correct, John Byrne has said that Dick Giordano did not actually ink the majority of the Man of Steel miniseries. After artist Frank McLaughlin passed away in March 2020, Byrne on his Byrne Robotics form posted “He was the uncredited inker on much of MAN OF STEEL.”

        I don’t know if Giordano or McLaughlin ever confirmed this. But I will say that the two of them had very similar inking styles.

        I honestly think that the inking on the MOS miniseries looks great, whoever it was that actually did it, so I don’t think it’s that big a deal. But I guess I can understand why Byrne feels the way he does, especially if, as he says, Giordano promised that he’d be the sole inker on it.

  3. bitterscriptreader Avatar

    @davethormer – I share your opinion on Byrne’s self-inked works.

    Upon reflection, BTAS is probably closest to what I’d want from the next live action Batman series. I want a world crazy enough to encompass Clayface and a Poison Ivy who controls plants. It’s been almost 30 years since we had a Batman movie that wild.

    1. davethomer Avatar
      davethomer

      BTAS is absolutely a gold standard and DC managed to capture it perfectly in comics with THE BATMAN ADVENTURES, too. I will say I liked the brighter tone of the BRAVE & THE BOLD cartoon as a contrast and a reminder that there are different ways to make the character work.

      Now that you mention it, I think BATMAN & ROBIN is the only live action Batman project with a superpowered villain in my lifetime (unless you count BATMAN v SUPERMAN – come to think of it I don’t know about GOTHAM either, but that’d be an edge case anyway). That blows my mind as a contrast between live action and both the comics and cartoons.

      (BTW – it only really matters if the tags are supposed to notify me, as opposed to just being a label, but I only have one R in my last name.)

  4. bitterscriptreader Avatar

    @Ben – I agree. I think Byrne does have a legitimate beef with Giordano, both on the inking and also with his later frustration that Licensing was still using the Pre-Crisis designs.

    Think of all of it in terms of some corporate job. They headhunt you, the CEO is all smiles, says that they’re so impressed with your work that they’re making YOU the guy to handle their biggest and most prestigious account. And not only that, you’re getting a corner office the same size and view as the boss’s!

    And then once you show up, you find yourself relocated to a smaller office. Then it turns out, while they’ve got you on their biggest account, so much of what you came there to do isn’t being implemented globally, and maybe most insultingly, the close personal relationship you were promised with the CEO doesn’t exist and you spend most of your time interacting with his underling.

    Sometimes even when the final product looks good and everything’s a success, the personal slights are hard to ignore. Byrne often comes off as a guy with an axe to grind, but I don’t begrudge him his feelings on this matter at least.

Leave a Reply

I’m Adam Mallinger

I’m a lifelong Superman fan who got to live his dream in 2020 when I was hired on the CW show SUPERMAN & LOIS as Writers’ Assistant. In my second season there, I was promoted to Staff Writer and I remained on staff through seasons 2 and 3. During my time there I wrote one episode in each of the four seasons and co-wrote the SUPERMAN & LOIS comic.

I also used to blog and tweet under the name The Bitter Script Reader. I also wrote the book MICHAEL F-ING BAY: THE UNHERALDED GENIUS IN MICHAEL BAY’S FILMS under that name.

I started this blog as a tribute to my favorite era of Superman, the Post-Crisis incarnation also often referred to as “The Triangle Era.” Each issue of Post-Crisis Superman will be covered on the 40th anniversary of its original release.

Email me at ZuulTheReader@gmail.com

Let’s connect

Mega-Post of links to S&L Blu-rays, DVDs, Comics, interviews, Behind-the-Scenes Posts and Commissions!
Want to buy Post-Crisis Superman collections? Read this post!

Discover more from Super Fan XL - 40 Years Of Post-Crisis Superman

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Super Fan XL - 40 Years Of Post-Crisis Superman

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading